Group Topic Pid Offset logSize Lag Owner demo-group demo-topic 0 9678273 9858394 180121 xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6-0 demo-group demo-topic 1 9689443 9873522 184079 xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6-1 demo-group demo-topic 2 9676875 9855874 178999 xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c-0 demo-group demo-topic 3 9683393 9864518 181125 xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c-1
发现消费者的offset与logSize差距太大，lag值都过10w了。
正常的情况
Group Topic Pid Offset logSize Lag Owner demo-group demo-topic 0 9860587 9860587 0 demo-group_tomcat2-1512984437115-fc1ee57b-0 demo-group demo-topic 1 9875814 9875814 0 demo-group_tomcat2-1512984437115-fc1ee57b-0 demo-group demo-topic 2 9858213 9858214 1 demo-group_tomcat2-1512984437115-fc1ee57b-1 demo-group demo-topic 3 9866744 9866744 0 demo-group_tomcat2-1512984437115-fc1ee57b-2
像这种lag差距比较少的，是正常的。
查看topic的partition
Topic:demo-topic PartitionCount:4 ReplicationFactor:2 Configs:
Topic: demo-topic Partition: 0 Leader: 3 Replicas: 3,4 Isr: 4,3
Topic: demo-topic Partition: 1 Leader: 4 Replicas: 4,1 Isr: 1,4
Topic: demo-topic Partition: 2 Leader: 1 Replicas: 1,2 Isr: 1,2
Topic: demo-topic Partition: 3 Leader: 2 Replicas: 2,3 Isr: 2,3
topic是4个分区，因此4个consumer来消费是正常的。 问题可能是消费者消费速度太慢，或者消费者消费异常。
排查
jstack -l pid
2017-12-27 04:06:23
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.66-b17 mixed mode):
"Attach Listener" #12286 daemon prio=9 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f2920001000 nid=0x3087 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
"ConsumerFetcherThread-xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6-0-3" #9263 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f287400d800 nid=0x2440 waiting on condition [0x00007f285e6eb000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007048874b0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:350)
at kafka.consumer.PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue(PartitionTopicInfo.scala:60)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread.processPartitionData(ConsumerFetcherThread.scala:49)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:128)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at scala.collection.immutable.Map$Map1.foreach(Map.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.utils.Utils$.inLock(Utils.scala:535)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:108)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:86)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"ConsumerFetcherThread-xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6-0-4" #9262 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f28740c2800 nid=0x243f waiting on condition [0x00007f291950d000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007048086d8> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:350)
at kafka.consumer.PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue(PartitionTopicInfo.scala:60)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread.processPartitionData(ConsumerFetcherThread.scala:49)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:128)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at scala.collection.immutable.Map$Map1.foreach(Map.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.utils.Utils$.inLock(Utils.scala:535)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:108)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:86)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6-leader-finder-thread" #9261 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x0000000002302800 nid=0x243e waiting on condition [0x00007f28bd1df000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x0000000703d06518> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager$LeaderFinderThread.doWork(ConsumerFetcherManager.scala:61)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"consume-2" #62 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f28f8e86000 nid=0x51 waiting on condition [0x00007f28bd3e1000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x000000070440cd38> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
"consume-1" #61 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f28f8e84800 nid=0x50 waiting on condition [0x00007f28bd4e2000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x000000070440cd38> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
"xxx-service-dpqpc-1510557406684-e2171bd6_watcher_executor" #59 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f28fb685800 nid=0x4e waiting on condition [0x00007f28bd8e4000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007048878d0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2163)
at kafka.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector$ZKRebalancerListener$$anon$1.run(ZookeeperConsumerConnector.scala:544)
上面consume-1以及consume-2是具体的消费kafka的业务线程
error log
2017-12-16 12:53:34.257 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] k.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector : [xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c], begin rebalancing consumer xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c try #1 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager : [ConsumerFetcherManager-1510557399586] Stopping leader finder thread 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager : [ConsumerFetcherManager-1510557399586] Stopping all fetchers 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager : [ConsumerFetcherManager-1510557399586] All connections stopped 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] k.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector : [xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c], Cleared all relevant queues for this fetcher 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] k.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector : [xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c], Cleared the data chunks in all the consumer message iterators 2017-12-16 12:53:34.348 INFO 7 --- [0.2.84.118:2181] k.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector : [xxx-service-q7vch-1510557399475-b1d7d22c], Committing all offsets after clearing the fetcher queues
日志几乎没有消费到消息的痕迹，但是lag确又有那么多。
一开始看异常日志，找到这个，加上上面的jstack，看到ConsumerFetcherThread一直blocking在PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue，有点怀疑是rebalance引起的死锁或阻塞。之前jstack忘记加-l，无法看到死锁信息。网上查了一下，看到 ConsumerFetcherThread deadlock? 有提到类似的问题，不过看是14年的帖子的，kafka0.8.2.2版本应该是有修复了才对。紧接着看到
The fetchers are blocked on the queue since it is full, is your consumer iterator stopped and hence not getting more data from it?
有点开始怀疑是否是自己的业务线程没有捕获异常挂了，因而就没有消费了。重启了下程序，看log，刷刷的消费消息。再jstack对比一下
"ConsumerFetcherThread-xxx-376jt-1514353818187-b37be1c0-0-3" #81 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fe39c004000 nid=0x63 waiting on condition [0x00007fe3931f4000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007822ac4e0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:350)
at kafka.consumer.PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue(PartitionTopicInfo.scala:60)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread.processPartitionData(ConsumerFetcherThread.scala:49)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:128)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at scala.collection.immutable.Map$Map1.foreach(Map.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.utils.Utils$.inLock(Utils.scala:535)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:108)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:86)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"ConsumerFetcherThread-xxx-376jt-1514353818187-b37be1c0-0-4" #80 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fe39c003000 nid=0x62 waiting on condition [0x00007fe3926ea000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007821c9a68> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:350)
at kafka.consumer.PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue(PartitionTopicInfo.scala:60)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread.processPartitionData(ConsumerFetcherThread.scala:49)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:128)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at scala.collection.immutable.Map$Map1.foreach(Map.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:109)
at kafka.utils.Utils$.inLock(Utils.scala:535)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:108)
at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:86)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"xxx-376jt-1514353818187-b37be1c0-leader-finder-thread" #79 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x0000000001f5a000 nid=0x61 waiting on condition [0x00007fe3920e7000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x0000000782154c30> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
at kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherManager$LeaderFinderThread.doWork(ConsumerFetcherManager.scala:61)
at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:60)
"consume-2" #62 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fe48da13800 nid=0x51 runnable [0x00007fe392ff1000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
//......
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.executeFindMultiInternal(MongoTemplate.java:1948)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.doFind(MongoTemplate.java:1768)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.doFind(MongoTemplate.java:1751)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.find(MongoTemplate.java:625)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.findOne(MongoTemplate.java:590)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.findOne(MongoTemplate.java:582)
at com.xxx.consumer.KafkaStreamProcessor.process(KafkaStreamProcessor.java:37)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:333)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:190)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:157)
at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.AsyncExecutionInterceptor$1.call(AsyncExecutionInterceptor.java:115)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
"consume-1" #61 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fe48e310000 nid=0x50 runnable [0x00007fe3930f2000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
//...
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate$12.doInCollection(MongoTemplate.java:1157)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate$12.doInCollection(MongoTemplate.java:1137)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.execute(MongoTemplate.java:463)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.doUpdate(MongoTemplate.java:1137)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.upsert(MongoTemplate.java:1099)
at com.xxx.consumer.KafkaStreamProcessor.process(KafkaStreamProcessor.java:37)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:333)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:190)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:157)
at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.AsyncExecutionInterceptor$1.call(AsyncExecutionInterceptor.java:115)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
"xxx-376jt-1514353818187-b37be1c0_watcher_executor" #59 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fe48fe7c000 nid=0x4e waiting on condition [0x00007fe3934f5000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x0000000782155248> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2163)
at kafka.consumer.ZookeeperConsumerConnector$ZKRebalancerListener$$anon$1.run(ZookeeperConsumerConnector.scala:544)
对比一下，发现原来怀疑的ConsumerFetcherThread一直blocking在PartitionTopicInfo.enqueue在重启之后还是存在，因此可能是正常的。
在对比下consume-1与consume-2，发现了问题，有问题的线程堆栈没有看到自己的业务方法，而重启之后发现了业务方法。因此问题的原因渐渐明朗，就是因为没有catch异常导致。
业务方法
原来的业务方法大致如下
@Async
public void process(KafkaStream<byte[], byte[]> stream){
ConsumerIterator<byte[], byte[]> it = stream.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+":"+new String(it.next().message()));
}
}
这里有个疑问就是线程异常没有catch的话，理论上再次new的线程，id应该递增才对，但是通过实验发现，走async的，抛异常之后，线程id都不变。
spring-core-4.3.13.RELEASE-sources.jar!/org/springframework/util/CustomizableThreadCreator.java
public class CustomizableThreadCreator implements Serializable {
private final AtomicInteger threadCount = new AtomicInteger(0);
/**
* Template method for the creation of a new {@link Thread}.
* <p>The default implementation creates a new Thread for the given
* {@link Runnable}, applying an appropriate thread name.
* @param runnable the Runnable to execute
* @see #nextThreadName()
*/
public Thread createThread(Runnable runnable) {
Thread thread = new Thread(getThreadGroup(), runnable, nextThreadName());
thread.setPriority(getThreadPriority());
thread.setDaemon(isDaemon());
return thread;
}
/**
* Return the thread name to use for a newly created {@link Thread}.
* <p>The default implementation returns the specified thread name prefix
* with an increasing thread count appended: e.g. "SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor-0".
* @see #getThreadNamePrefix()
*/
protected String nextThreadName() {
return getThreadNamePrefix() + this.threadCount.incrementAndGet();
}
//...
}
这里的threadCount没有看到调用decrement方法，因此如果线程异常挂掉，则理论上新补充的线程id应该是递增的。
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_71.jdk/Contents/Home/src.zip!/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.java
final void runWorker(Worker w) {
Thread wt = Thread.currentThread();
Runnable task = w.firstTask;
w.firstTask = null;
w.unlock(); // allow interrupts
boolean completedAbruptly = true;
try {
while (task != null || (task = getTask()) != null) {
w.lock();
// If pool is stopping, ensure thread is interrupted;
// if not, ensure thread is not interrupted. This
// requires a recheck in second case to deal with
// shutdownNow race while clearing interrupt
if ((runStateAtLeast(ctl.get(), STOP) ||
(Thread.interrupted() &&
runStateAtLeast(ctl.get(), STOP))) &&
!wt.isInterrupted())
wt.interrupt();
try {
beforeExecute(wt, task);
Throwable thrown = null;
try {
task.run();
} catch (RuntimeException x) {
thrown = x; throw x;
} catch (Error x) {
thrown = x; throw x;
} catch (Throwable x) {
thrown = x; throw new Error(x);
} finally {
afterExecute(task, thrown);
}
} finally {
task = null;
w.completedTasks++;
w.unlock();
}
}
completedAbruptly = false;
} finally {
processWorkerExit(w, completedAbruptly);
}
}
private void processWorkerExit(Worker w, boolean completedAbruptly) {
if (completedAbruptly) // If abrupt, then workerCount wasn't adjusted
decrementWorkerCount();
final ReentrantLock mainLock = this.mainLock;
mainLock.lock();
try {
completedTaskCount += w.completedTasks;
workers.remove(w);
} finally {
mainLock.unlock();
}
tryTerminate();
int c = ctl.get();
if (runStateLessThan(c, STOP)) {
if (!completedAbruptly) {
int min = allowCoreThreadTimeOut ? 0 : corePoolSize;
if (min == 0 && ! workQueue.isEmpty())
min = 1;
if (workerCountOf(c) >= min)
return; // replacement not needed
}
addWorker(null, false);
}
}
调试发现completedAbruptly都是false，因而业务线程没有抛异常，这岂不是矛盾了。突然想起async注解的拦截，渐渐豁然开朗。
AsyncExecutionInterceptor
spring-aop-4.3.13.RELEASE-sources.jar!/org/springframework/aop/interceptor/AsyncExecutionInterceptor.java
@Override
public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
Class<?> targetClass = (invocation.getThis() != null ? AopUtils.getTargetClass(invocation.getThis()) : null);
Method specificMethod = ClassUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(invocation.getMethod(), targetClass);
final Method userDeclaredMethod = BridgeMethodResolver.findBridgedMethod(specificMethod);
AsyncTaskExecutor executor = determineAsyncExecutor(userDeclaredMethod);
if (executor == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException(
"No executor specified and no default executor set on AsyncExecutionInterceptor either");
}
Callable<Object> task = new Callable<Object>() {
@Override
public Object call() throws Exception {
try {
Object result = invocation.proceed();
if (result instanceof Future) {
return ((Future<?>) result).get();
}
}
catch (ExecutionException ex) {
handleError(ex.getCause(), userDeclaredMethod, invocation.getArguments());
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
handleError(ex, userDeclaredMethod, invocation.getArguments());
}
return null;
}
};
return doSubmit(task, executor, invocation.getMethod().getReturnType());
}
async注解通过AsyncExecutionInterceptor拦截，然后包了一层，处理了异常，因此线程池里头是没有异常的。
小结
- 使用kafka消费数据的时候，需要对offset的lag值进行实时监控，以确认消费速度是否ok
- 调用KafkaStream的iterator消费线程必须catch住异常，否则抛出了异常，就停止消费了。
doc
注：本文内容来自互联网，旨在为开发者提供分享、交流的平台。如有涉及文章版权等事宜，请你联系站长进行处理。